Scott MacLean
2008-03-20 14:03:28 UTC
Hi,
There seems to be a bit of confusion about what question 5(b) is asking
in regards to finding the time at which the reference signal was
received. The idea is as follows:
-using the correlation function, you can find the sample number at which
it seems most likely the reference tone started.
-using the sampling rate (8192 Hz) you can determine the actual time at
which the tone was received. The physical units work out as follows:
(time) = (sample) / (samples/time)
Note that the length of the synchronization tone (0.125s) doesn't come
into play here since all you are concerned with is the time of the start
of the tone.
Also be sure you are measuring the shift of the signal in the correct
direction. If you use the correlation function from the course notes, a
positive shift offset means the second signal is shifted to the right
with respect to the first signal.
Scott
There seems to be a bit of confusion about what question 5(b) is asking
in regards to finding the time at which the reference signal was
received. The idea is as follows:
-using the correlation function, you can find the sample number at which
it seems most likely the reference tone started.
-using the sampling rate (8192 Hz) you can determine the actual time at
which the tone was received. The physical units work out as follows:
(time) = (sample) / (samples/time)
Note that the length of the synchronization tone (0.125s) doesn't come
into play here since all you are concerned with is the time of the start
of the tone.
Also be sure you are measuring the shift of the signal in the correct
direction. If you use the correlation function from the course notes, a
positive shift offset means the second signal is shifted to the right
with respect to the first signal.
Scott